Disclaimer:
Please be aware that the content herein has not been peer reviewed. It consists of personal reflections, insights, and learnings of the contributor(s). It may not be exhaustive, nor does it aim to be authoritative knowledge.
Overview
Prepared by (Name of the experimenter)
Lorena Moscovich
On date (Day/Month/Year)
2/5/2024
Current status of experimental activity
Completed
What portfolio does this activity correspond to? If any
Renewable energies learning
What is the frontier challenge does this activity responds to?
The main challenge is the effective adoption of renewable technologies (solar water heaters) in low-income communities in Jujuy.
What is the learning question(from your action learning plan) is this activity related to?
Main question: What facilitate or hinder the adoption of renewable energies?
Derived questions: Why do some people not use them [(the solar water heaters)] even when they were given for free along with their homes?
What was the experience of people who suddenly found themselves using solar water heaters? Did they use them? Did they have to change their daily lives to do so? What were their opinions on these devices?
Please categorize the type that best identifies this experimental activity:
Quasi experimental (Analytical, observations, etc)
Which sector are you partnering with for this activity? Please select all that apply
Civil Society/ NGOs
Please list the names of partners mentioned in the previous question:
Fundación EcoAndina
Design
What is the specific learning intent of the activity?
The specific learning from this activity is to understand what factors favor and/or hinder the adoption of solar water heaters in low-income neighborhoods of Jujuy.
What is your hypothesis? IF... THEN....
This study was exploratory in nature. Therefore, it sought to understand which factors hinder or facilitate the adoption of solar water heaters in Jujuy. From there, in a second experimental phase, five hypotheses are planned to be tested:
There is a positive relationship between receiving information about the technical aspects and maintenance of the solar water heater and the evaluation of the device.
There is a positive relationship between receiving information about the economic benefits (savings) of the solar water heater and the evaluation of the device.
There is a positive relationship between receiving information regarding the technical aspects and maintenance of the solar water heater and the intention to use the device.
There is a positive relationship between receiving information about the economic benefits (savings) of the solar water heater and the intention to use the device.
There is a positive (and stronger) relationship between receiving information based on neighbors' experiences concerning the technical aspects and maintenance of the solar water heater and the intention to use the device, compared to receiving the same information without involving the neighbors
Does the activity use a control group for comparison?
No, it does not use a control group
How is the intervention assigned to different groups in your experiment?
Other
Describe which actions will you take to test your hypothesis:
In-depth semi-structured interviews, focus group, and surveys.
What is the unit of analysis of this experimental activity?
Household level
Please describe the data collection technique proposed
In-depth semi-structured interviews, focus group, and surveys.
What is the timeline of the experimental activity? (Months/Days)
5 months: from January to May 2024.
Results
Was the original hypothesis (If.. then) proven or disproven?
In the exploratory phase 129 households were surveyed, where only 9 used the solar water heater exclusively, 45 used it alongside other devices, and 75 did not use it. In many households that had water heaters but chose not to use them, installation issues, technical difficulties, and a lack of training and support were reported. Simple and low-complexity technical problems that had gone undetected were identified, including the improper installation of the device on the roof. This situation also applies to more costly but similarly low-complexity problems, such as construction deficiencies in the homes. The lack of follow-up and proper training has been a significant obstacle to the effective adoption of this technology. The absence of a critical mass of users further compounded the lack of support. As a result, non-users had no access to peer-provided information about shared experiences or potential solutions, nor did they have neighbors who could guide them through the learning curve of using the devices.
Do you have observations about the methodology chosen for the experiment? What would you change?
The methodology for the Jujuy solar water heater project provides valuable insights through a mixed-methods approach, combining qualitative interviews and focus groups with survey data. However, the small sample of exclusive users and the reliance on self-reported data limit the scope of the findings. To strengthen the impact of this study, we would recommend increasing the sample size, incorporating objective usage metrics, and conducting longitudinal assessments to track behavior changes over time. Additionally, establishing peer-to-peer learning networks could also address the gap in technical support, enhancing adoption and sustainability.
From design to results, how long did this activity take? (Time in months)
5 months
What were the actual monetary resources invested in this activity? (Amount in USD)
Field Managers: $1300
Interviewers: $1189
Household incentives: $1415
2-person mission: $752
Total: $4656
Does this activity have a follow up or a next stage? Please explain
We propose conducting an experiment to identify the factors that promote the adoption and use of installed solar water heaters in households. These devices are high-cost, yet residents often lack the technical means and financial resources for proper maintenance. The experiment will assess strategies to promote the use of solar energy among indigenous migrant populations living in the metropolitan area of the city.
This study revealed that only 9% of surveyed households used the solar water heater as their sole source of hot water, while 45% used it in combination with other devices, and the remaining households did not use it at all.
Interestingly, those who used the solar water heater rated it positively. Meanwhile, those who did not use it cited reasons such as a lack of information about its operation, unawareness of simple user-managed solutions, a lack of interaction with neighbors who had positive experiences, installation difficulties, or minor adjustments that could have been resolved with proper technical support. In sum, the survey demonstrated that a well-functioning technology is often disregarded when it is not properly installed or when users lack sufficient information about its use.
The findings highlighted that training, the positive influence of other users, and technical support are key factors in optimizing the use of solar water heaters and ensuring their full integration into the daily lives of beneficiary families. All identified problems had relatively simple and low-cost solutions, suggesting that an experiment could help determine the impact of these solutions on the adoption and usage of the devices.
Building on these insights, the proposed experiment seeks to measure the impact of specific informational interventions on the perception and use of solar water heaters.
A "shock of information" will be implemented in two formats: one providing objective technical information and the other leveraging social norms, using testimonials from neighbors who have successfully optimized their use of these devices.
This experiment will assess changes in users' opinions about solar water heaters and in the willingness of non-users to adopt them before and after the intervention. It will identify effective strategies to enhance the adoption and optimization of solar energy use. The results will serve as inputs for future communication campaigns, strategies, and solutions aimed at expanding access to renewable energy solutions by promoting the adoption of solar water heaters and optimizing their use for current users.
Given the high cost of the already installed equipment and the difficulty of accessing new technologies in the region, this experiment is essential to ensuring the energy sustainability of families (https://www.undp.org/es/argentina/publicaciones/spotlight-renewable-energy-solutions-mapping-argentina) who already have these devices on their rooftops. The combination of the restoration project with the experiment will not only improve the existing infrastructure but also generate replicable knowledge for other regions facing similar challenges.
Learning
What do you know now about the action plan learning question that you did not know before? What were your main learnings during this experiment?
The main learnings include identifying technical and training barriers as the biggest obstacles to the adoption of renewable technologies, and the importance of continuous support to maximize the project's benefits. On the one hand, the technical barriers include the incorrect orientation of the device on rooftops, poor installation, and the incompatibility of housing infrastructure with the water heaters. On the other hand, the training barriers involve the lack of follow-up after installation, as there was no support to help users navigate the learning curve of integrating a new device with these characteristics into their daily lives. Moreover, a support network within the community could facilitate the exchange of experiences and solutions among neighbors, who have often demonstrated an ability to solve problems creatively and independently.
What were the main obstacles and challenges you encountered during this activity?
Who at UNDP might benefit from the results of this experimental activity? Why?
First, the results may be of interest to the country office. In particular, the environment & sustainable development department can benefit from the findings of this experiment, as they promote the integration of environmental considerations into the development process, driving projects that contribute to sustainability and the fight against poverty. Additionally, they support the development of public policies at both general and territorial scales. On the other hand, these results may also be relevant to the inclusive growth department, as it works with vulnerable populations, particularly those that could benefit from cost-saving initiatives.
Second, these findings could be of interest to laboratories in other countries working on similar topics, as well as to RBLAC and other bureaus.
Who outside UNDP might benefit from the results of this experiment? and why?
The results of this experiment could be beneficial for various sectors beyond UNDP. Firstly, both the Argentine government and public policy designers could directly benefit by obtaining key information to implement similar initiatives in other regions, promoting access to renewable energy in vulnerable communities. They could use the results as a valuable tool, providing a model for public policies that seek to integrate sustainable energy solutions into social housing programs.
Comments
Log in to add a comment or reply.