Fog Harvesters: Securing Water for Chuquisaca's Future

Scaling

Cost

SDG(s)

Sustainable Development Goal(s)

2Zero hunger

6Clean water and sanitation

13Climate action

Disclaimer:

Please be aware that the content herein has not been peer reviewed. It consists of personal reflections, insights, and learnings of the contributor(s). It may not be exhaustive, nor does it aim to be authoritative knowledge.

Overview

Prepared by (Name of the experimenter)

Fog Harvesters

On date (Day/Month/Year)

01/12/2021

What action learning plan is this activity related to?

The "Fog Harvesters" experiment is related to an action learning plan focused on climate resilience and water security. The plan addresses water scarcity in vulnerable communities by using fog-harvesting technology to collect water for both human consumption and agricultural use. It aligns with sustainable water management practices, promoting adaptation to climate change, and enhancing the livelihoods of rural families by providing an innovative, environmentally friendly solution to water access issue

Design

What is the specific learning intent of the activity? Why is it important to do this experiment?

Specific Learning Intent of the Activity: The activity aims to explore the effectiveness of fog-harvesting technology in addressing water scarcity for human consumption and agriculture in rural communities. It seeks to learn how this technology can improve water security and agricultural productivity under conditions of climate stress. Why Is It Important? This experiment is crucial because it provides an innovative, sustainable solution to water scarcity, which is essential for the livelihoods of vulnerable communities facing the impacts of climate change. The project also promotes food security and community resilience

What is your hypothesis? IF... THEN....

IF fog-harvesting technology is implemented in vulnerable rural communities, THEN it will significantly improve access to clean water for human consumption.

Does the activity use a control group for comparison?

No, it does not use a control group

Describe which actions, with whom, where, when will you (or did you) take to test your hypothesis:

Since the "Fog Harvesters" project was not implemented, the actions were not carried out. The proposal remained in the planning stage, despite the intent to install fog-harvesting systems and collaborate with PRODECO. Due to challenges, such as lack of execution, the project was never brought to the testing phase where the hypothesis could be validated

If you worked with partners, please choose what sector they belong to (select all that apply)

Academia, Government (& related)

What is the total estimated monetary resources needed for this experiment?

Between 10,000- and 20,000 USD

Please upload any supporting links

Results

Was the original hypothesis (If.. then) proven or disproven? In which way do the results support the original hypothesis or not?

What are the most important learning outcomes of the experiment? Are any changes recommended?

Considering the outcomes of this experimental activity, which of the following best describe what happened after? (Please select all that apply)

This experiment did not scale yet

Please add any supporting links that describe the planning, implementation, results of learning of this activity? For example a tweet, a blog, or a report.

Learning

What were the main obstacles and challenges you encountered during this activity? What advise would you give colleagues trying to replicate this experimental activity?