Disclaimer:
Please be aware that the content herein has not been peer reviewed. It consists of personal reflections, insights, and learnings of the contributor(s). It may not be exhaustive, nor does it aim to be authoritative knowledge.
Learnings on your challenge
What are the top key insights you generated about your learning challenge during this Action Learning Plan? (Please list a maximum of 5 key insights)
The solutions mapping set out to identify and systematize more than 100 initiatives
from different parts of the world, very diverse among themselves. The goal was
to generate knowledge from them, bring to light and value other related
experiences already underway—even when they do not explicitly refer to this
issue—and contribute to the public conversation about possible ways of
addressing it. This portfolio of solutions also opens a broad field for
testing, since while some initiatives are backed by empirical evidence, others
need to be trialed before being replicated or scaled up or redesigned to adapt
to the sociocultural contexts where they will be implemented. Ultimately, it
is people’s appropriation of these initiatives—and therefore the adoption of
new habits, behaviours and perspectives—that truly turns interventions into
solutions.
Based on this analysis, several key recommendations emerge for addressing unwanted
loneliness:
Unwanted loneliness as a
subjective feeling and social phenomenon, a duality reflected in interventions: it is worth exploring the potential, derived from State modernization
processes, of using available citizen information responsibly to deploy
personalized and segmented strategies for outreach, consultation, detection and
closer, more continuous monitoring of individual life trajectories, without
losing sight of scale.
Public space and digital space as two sides of the same coin: what public space offers and brings closer matters because it enables (or hinders) spontaneous encounters, eye contact, places to rest and moments of pause or gathering. Urban design not only conditions the quality and frequency of everyday interactions; it also generates meaning and identity. Given the nature of the mapped solutions, it is recommended to implement a tactical urbanism approach, that is, interventions designed as low-cost, quick-to-implement prototypes that can be tested before scaling up.
In parallel, it is important to address the specific challenges of
digital space, such as how to reduce overexposure or problematic uses that
reinforce feelings of loneliness. It is also necessary to design and implement
user-centred digital strategies that treat proximity as a key input to
strengthen their approach, without replacing what happens in public space.
Local and even neighbourhood-level interventions: needs can vary
significantly from one place to another depending on available resources,
spaces, services and social networks. For example, in a neighbourhood with few
green spaces or informal meeting spots, “chat benches” could be installed,
while a city with a large student population may be an ideal place to promote
intergenerational cohabitation models. It is therefore necessary to identify
leverage points within a broader system that foster ways of sharing everyday
life and thus building community.
In this sense, there is an invitation to recognize the potential of
citizen labs—as part of institutional processes—to harness collective
intelligence and bring together different types of knowledge and perspectives
for the design, adjustment and implementation of initiatives. Ideation,
co-creation and citizen validation workshops can become highly useful tools to
prioritize lines of action based on the population’s real needs, explore
assumptions, design the most appropriate interventions for each territory,
rethink those already underway or about to be rolled out, identify what works
and what does not and why, build communities of knowledge and practice, and
generate synergies with multisectoral actors, among other possibilities. These
proposals must be designed with attention to who is invited, and to the
dynamics that enable or hinder participation, so that all voices can be
included and recognized.
Health also includes community
life: the quality of social ties—which make possible
unhurried time, mutual support, care and a sense of belonging—is an
increasingly problematized dimension of healthy living, and one that can bring
wellbeing to people. Its expression in family and community life, or in dense
networks of relationships beyond those built in virtual spaces, is one of its
key manifestations. This approach therefore complements and broadens the scope
of traditional health interventions and represents a central pillar in the struggle
against unwanted loneliness.
Innovation as a meeting point and
catalyst of purpose: from practices that enable
participation, to simple interventions promoted by the public sector making use
of existing resources, to new business models developed by the private sector
in response to emerging or anticipated needs, innovative solutions must keep in
mind the importance of providing imaginative responses and fostering social
connection. This approach is not limited to cutting-edge technology; rather, it
recognizes a basic need: people need others to feel well.
Communicate, always: invisibility is part of the problem. It is therefore a priority to
work on developing a narrative that highlights the issue, brings it onto the
public agenda, reduces stigma by framing it as a collective problem, and
encourages participation. As emphasized throughout, it is important to
communicate through multiple formats and channels, using messages tailored to
different audiences. Everything communicates: how the problem is framed and
awareness is raised; the data collected; the activities on offer and calls to
get involved; the progress of interventions; stories of impact; among many
other elements.
Considering the outcomes of this learning challenge, which of the following best describe the handover process? (Please select all that apply)
Our work has led to significant changes in our UNDP Country Office programming
Can you provide more detail on your handover process?
Through our R&D line of work, we provided technical assistance to a local government in the design of a methodological strategy to research on unwanted loneliness. In parallel, we designed and delivered a sensitization workshop for public officials, grounded in the findings of the solutions mapping, which marked the starting point of a local strategic planning process to address unwanted loneliness. We also produced a report—scheduled for publication in late December 2025—presenting the findings of the unwanted loneliness solutions mapping, along with a portfolio featuring more than 100 initiatives and resources related to the issue.
Please paste any link(s) to blog(s) or publication(s) that articulate the learnings on your frontier challenge.
https://www.undp.org/es/argentina/blog/you-are-not-alone-unwanted-loneliness-growing-challenge-emerging-solutions
https://www.undp.org/argentina/blog/connecting-solutions-mapping-unwanted-loneliness
Data and Methods
Relating to your types of data, why did you chose these? What gaps in available data were these addressing?
We chose solution mapping and sensitization workshop as our primary data sources to address the lack of localized, actionable evidence on unwanted loneliness, bridging the gap between fragmented international knowledge and the limited awareness and experiential understanding among local public officials.
Why was it necessary to apply the above innovation method on your frontier challenge? How did these help you to unpack the system?
It was necessary to apply participatory and solution-oriented innovation methods to reveal hidden assumptions, institutional blind spots, and interaction patterns around unwanted loneliness, helping unpack the system and identify concrete leverage points for local action.
Partners
Please indicate what partners you have actually worked with for this learning challenge.
Please state the name of the partner:
Government of the City of Córdoba
What sector does your partner belong to?
Government (&related)
Please provide a brief description of the partnership.
This collaboration builds on a well-established partnership between UNDP and the Government of the City of Córdoba, and further expands it by incorporating a thematic area that is expected to grow in relevance in the coming years.
Is this a new and unusual partner for UNDP?
Yes
End
Bonus question: How did the interplay of innovation methods, new forms of data and unusual partners enable you to learn & generate insights, that otherwise you would have not been able to achieve?
Unwanted loneliness was a largely invisible
issue at the national level and even more so locally, with scarce data and
fragmented responses. To address this gap, we developed a solutions mapping to
systematically identify and analyze existing initiatives that were already
tackling loneliness, often without naming it as such. By mapping a diverse set
of solutions —led by local governments, civil society organizations and
community-based actors— we were able to surface patterns, common intervention
logics and enabling conditions that do not appear in official data. This
approach allowed us to translate dispersed local knowledge into concrete,
actionable recommendations for public policy.
Please upload any further supporting evidence / documents / data you have produced on your frontier challenge that showcase your learnings.
https://www.undp.org/es/argentina/blog/you-are-not-alone-unwanted-loneliness-growing-challenge-emerging-solutions
https://www.undp.org/argentina/blog/connecting-solutions-mapping-unwanted-loneliness
The closing form saves automatically or via the blue "save changes" button the top left. Thank you
.
Comments
Log in to add a comment or reply.