Challenge statement
Challenge type: If you are working on multiple challenges, please indicate if this is your "big bet" or "exploratory" challenge.
Please note: we ask you to only submit a maximum of 3 challenges - 1x Big Bet, 2x Exploratory. Each challenge must be submitted individually.
EXPLORATORY
Challenge statement: What is your challenge? (Please answer in specific terms: "Our challenge is that...”.)
Our challenge is that in a context of violence, disinformation, accelerated and reinforced by various means and conditions, negatively impacts the perception of security at the individual and social level, and has various effects such as social panic, distrust in institutions and erratic actions among people, affecting public life, participation in public issues and community cohesion.
Background: What is the history of your challenge? What is causing or driving it? Who is involved? How does the current situation look like? What undesired effects does it produce?
The concept of infodemics refers to an influx of information that causes saturation in the information ecosystem, affecting people’s capacity to discern between truth and falseness. The proliferation of false or distorted information impacts the estimations of risk and insecurity that people can make, as well as externalities manifested in their community’s cohesion and resilience. Not having access to quality information, aggravated by a lack of technology and media literacy, can hinder the progress societies and governments make toward becoming more resilient in the face of challenges (Bunce, 2019).
With advances in information technology and its accessibility, the velocity and extent with which information, misinformation, and disinformation spread have grown. For people, organizations, and governments, information is vital to securing human and collective needs and making appropriate decisions (Katz, 2021). Its effectiveness or added value depends on the quality of the data acquired, and how it is understood, analyzed, and employed. Social media has facilitated adding to the public discourse beyond our natural limits and spaces, and even language barriers. This has been positive for raising awareness about topics in areas outside of their context and engaging people in more participative forms of government. It has motivated both civilians and governments to demand and compromise on accountability, transparency of information, and the creation of more effective mechanisms of checks and balances.
However, information technologies and platforms also allow people to create and share misleading information easily (Hook, 2022). Also key psychological factors like confirmation bias and people’s tendency to interact on social media through echo chambers combined with a lack of critical media skills can contribute to the spread of false information (Xu, 2021). This in turn can cause unnecessary anxiety, panic, uncertainty, confusion, mistrust, and misunderstandings among citizens, media and authorities, especially when the description of alleged events is charged with emotion (Sługocki & Sowa, 2021).
Mexico’s criminality index is on the top 3 countries in the World (Global Organized Crime Index, 2024) and within the country Zacatecas is on the lowest 5 states in the peace score that analyses trends and impacts of violence (Global Peace Index for Mexico, 2024). This relates to the phenomenon of disinformation, since a lack of knowledge and uncertainty about the future in contexts of crisis, like a region suffering the consequences of crime and violence, can become a breeding ground for the proliferation of false data and making the wrong choices based on it. When an event occurs, false information hinders a community’s capabilities to react and face a challenge (van Solinge, 2019). Despite being identified as the state with the most improvement in mater of safety and peace (Global Peace Index for Mexico, 2024), perception of insecurity persists (ENSU, 2024). The government of Zacatecas has expressed an interest in developing skills and resources for institutions and different sectors of society to discern truthful and assertive information and becoming better equipped and conscious as agents of integral information diffusion.
Sources:
Betancur González, Eleonora and Melamed, Claire. (2024, June 21). Global South leading the way on citizen-generated data. SciDev.Net. https://www.scidev.net/global/opinions/global-south-leading-the-way-on-citizen-generated-data/
Bunce, M. (2019). Humanitarian communication in a Post-Truth world. Journal of Humanitarian Affairs, 1(1), 49–55. https://doi.org/10.7227/jha.007
Delphine van Solinge (2019, June 12). Digital risks for populations in armed conflict: Five key gaps the humanitarian sector should address. Humanitarian Law & Policy Blog. International Committee of the Red Cross. https://blogs.icrc.org/law-and-policy/2019/06/12/digital-risks-populations-armed-conflict-five-key-gaps-humanitarian-sector/
Global Peace Index in Mexico (2024). Institute for Economics and Peace. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5eaa390ddf0dcb548e9dd5da/t/6642ff43b5cc3f2cc286e87b/1715666787084/MPI-ESP-2024-web-130524.pdf
Global Organized Crime Index (2024). Global Initiative Against Transnational Organized Crime https://ocindex.net/2023/heatmap/
Hook, Kristina. (2022). Social media misinformation and the prevention of political instability and mass atrocities. Stimson Center. https://www.stimson.org/2022/social-media-misinformation-and-the-prevention-of-political-instability-and-mass-atrocities/
INEGI. (2024). Encuesta Nacional de Seguridad Pública Urbana (ENSU), septiembre 2024: Presentación ejecutiva. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. https://www.inegi.org.mx/contenidos/programas/ensu/doc/ensu2024_septiembre_presentacion_ejecutiva.pdf
Katz, Eian. Liar’s war: Protecting civilians from disinformation during armed conflict. (2021, December 1). International Review of the Red Cross. https://international-review.icrc.org/articles/protecting-civilians-from-disinformation-during-armed-conflict-914
Sługocki, W., & Sowa, B. (2021). Disinformation as a threat to national security on the example of the COVID-19 pandemic. Security and Defence Quarterly, 35(3), 63–74. https://doi.org/10.35467/sdq/138876
Xu, Rachel. (2021, January 15). You can’t handle the truth: misinformation and humanitarian action. Humanitarian Law & Policy Blog. https://blogs.icrc.org/law-and-policy/2021/01/15/misinformation-humanitarian/
Quantitative evidence: What (official) data sources do you have on this challenge that better exemplifies the importance and urgency of this frontier challenge? You can add text, a link, or a picture.
Misinformation, disinformation, and the saturation of information within certain contexts can have negative impacts because people use these to make decisions that affect their future and that of their families and communities. Ideally, with the information provided people should be able to make accurate estimations of the real risk activities carry, but the perception of risk and fear does not match the actual probability of it happening.
Mexico’s National Institute of Statistics and Geography (INEGI) recently published its 2024 Q3 report for the National Survey of Urban Public Security (ENSU in Spanish). The report presents data about how the population in urban areas perceive the overall safety of their city and helps governments make decisions regarding appropriate security measures and policies.
This graph shows the percentages of people over 18 who feel unsafe in their city, reported in September 2024. For Fresnillo, it’s 87.9%, and for Zacatecas City, 78.5%. Most people in Zacatecas living in these urban areas believe that they live in communities prone to violence, and with this in mind, make decisions that affect their everyday life and social interactions. In this matter, the cities of Fresnillo and Zacatecas are among the top 5 cities in Mexico that changed their habit of letting minors go out of their home, walking at night, visiting relatives, or carrying valuables with them when in the streets due to the fear of becoming victims of crime. The believe that these activities or actions imposes a risk to themselves, also leads to a greater percentage of the population adopting measures to prevent the possibility of becoming a victim of crime.
Image 2.2 identifies Fresnillo among the top 3 cities in the country where people report feeling unsafe in the streets they commonly use in their day-to-day lives. In Fresnillo, the percentage reported is 79.7%, and for the municipality of Zacatecas, 56.9%. In other words, more than half of the people in the urban area of Zacatecas believed that doing usual activities and going out of their homes imposes a risk to themselves.
The report also highlights the asymmetry of risk perception among women and men, with women feeling more insecure in every dimension (approximately 10% points) (Image 1.3).
The channels through which people consume information have also changed gradually (Image 1.4). During the first trimester of 2024, the adult population of Mexico was most likely to inform themselves about crime and related news through television (58.6%), followed by Facebook (53.8%), and then conversations with members from their community (53.7%). In the last survey pertaining to the third trimester, the adult population that watches the news on T.V. had slightly increased to 59.9%, and informing themselves through conversations with family members, neighbors and those close to their house increased to 57.6% (4 percentage points more). Facebook however decreased down to 53.8%, but all are still very common as half the population resort to these. The graph makes a distinction between types of conversation environments, as conversations around housing environments are in the top three but lower on the list are conversations around work or school environments. This last category also decreased from 19.4% in the first trimester of 2024 to 18.6 in the third.
Sources:
INEGI. (2024). Encuesta Nacional de Seguridad Pública Urbana (ENSU), septiembre 2024: Presentación ejecutiva. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. https://www.inegi.org.mx/contenidos/programas/ensu/doc/ensu2024_septiembre_presentacion_ejecutiva.pdf
Observatorio Interactivo de incidencia delictiva. (2024). https://delitosmexico.onc.org.mx/tendencia/zacatecas?unit=folders&indicator=researchFoldersRate&group=month&crime=0&states=32056%2C32017&domain=
Qualitative evidence: What weak signals have you recently spotted that characterizes its urgency? Please provide qualitative information that better exemplifies the importance and urgency of this frontier challenge. You can add text, a link, or a picture.
The spread of disinformation is not a new issue. The COVID-19 pandemic underscored how quickly false narratives can proliferate, particularly through social media and word of mouth. The World Health Organization (WHO) has highlighted the global challenge of infodemics—where false or misleading information spreads rapidly, influencing public perception and behavior. The variety of impacts that the contagion of false narratives about COVID-19 could have not just psychologically or health-wise, but also in the economic, scientific, social, and political spheres. Within this context, the WHO created guidelines that center people as nodes and parts of an information ecosystem and offered steps that could aid in reducing the spread of misinformation, including receiving, capturing, processing, reacting, storing, sharing, and reproducing data and stories (World Health Organization, 2024). (Image 2.1)
A study by Ecker et al. describes what are the socio-affective and cognitive drivers that originate misinformation and false beliefs. Often, people are not responsible of the deliberation part of choosing which information to believe, rely on and repeat. They tend to go with their gut instinct and intuition of what they think might be the right choice instead of pondering with the data available. This may be influenced by confirmation bias and one’s own individual preferences. Added to this, a false belief is strengthened when repeated. When a false piece of information is repeated often enough, people will form a familiarity with it and be more likely to accept it as a truth. Additionally, people often fail to evaluate who the source is or forget if they have published unreliable information in the past. People can also forget if evidence that proves a claim wrong exists. On the bottom side of the graphic, the emotional drivers discussed describe that when a source is written in a way that appeals to people’s emotions, they are more appealing and easier to digest. When it comes to group cohesion, familiarity and a confirmation bias, information that comes from a well-liked person or a member from the same group, an individual will be biased towards trusting it more easily (Ecker et al., 2022). (Image 2.2)
In times of heightened tension, whether due to security threats or other phenomena, the public's need for timely, factual updates becomes even more pronounced. When such events occur, the lack of accessible, high-quality reporting can create an information void, leading individuals to seek out or generate alternative narratives that may not always be trustworthy. This situation becomes even more complex when sources are influenced by personal speculations or rumors, which can amplify fear and confusion (Sługocki and Sowa, 2021).
In the case of Sinaloa, a neighboring state that has recently seen a big surge in violence, they have been dealing with their own concerns regarding misinformation around security news. After a series of events involving the cartels, waves of information have been flowing, both written and graphic, and often with disparities between sources. When this happens, people are highly likely to start questioning their authorities and official sources, furthering anxiety amongst communities. Instances of a “social psychosis” and a rise in mental health disorders have been reported due to the clashes between cartels and their consequences on the civilian population (Vargas, 2024). In Zacatecas, also families of missing people face disinformation and fear of threats from criminal groups and it is often non-profit initiatives, like Sangre de mi Sangre (Blood of my Blood) that give guidance to people, articulate research initiatives and have events all throughout Zacatecas to disseminate what to do in such cases and offer empathy to victims (Valle, 2023).
Sources:
Ecker, U. K. H., Lewandowsky, S., Cook, J., Schmid, P., Fazio, L. K., Brashier, N., Kendeou, P., Vraga, E. K., & Amazeen, M. A. (2022). The psychological drivers of misinformation belief and its resistance to correction. Nature Reviews Psychology, 1(1), 13–29. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-021-00006-y
Lorenc, T., Petticrew, M., Whitehead, M., Neary, D., Clayton, S., Wright, K., Thomson, H., Cummins, S., Sowden, A., & Renton, A. (2014, March 1). Review of theories and pathways: findings. Crime, Fear of Crime and Mental Health: Synthesis of Theory and Systematic Reviews of Interventions and Qualitative Evidence - NCBI Bookshelf. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK262852/
Sługocki, W., & Sowa, B. (2021). Disinformation as a threat to national security on the example of the COVID-19 pandemic. Security and Defence Quarterly, 35(3), 63–74. https://doi.org/10.35467/sdq/138876
UNDP. (2024) Would I lie to you? https://feature.undp.org/would-i-lie-to-you/?_gl=1*x6ybe7*_gcl_au*NTYzNTE2NTI5LjE3MjU1NTE0NTQ.*_ga*MTU2MzQzNDY3NS4xNzI1NTUxNDcy*_ga_3W7LPK0WP1*MTcyNjA3NzgxMC4xMi4wLjE3MjYwNzc4MTIuNTguMC4w
Vargas, O. (2024, September 19). Qué es la ‘psicosis social’, el padecimiento que los habitantes de Culiacán comienzan a sufrir por enfrentamientos entre Los Chapitos y La Mayiza. Infobae. https://www.infobae.com/mexico/2024/09/19/que-es-la-psicosis-social-el-padecimiento-que-los-habitantes-de-culiacan-comienzan-a-sufrir-por-enfrentamientos-entre-los-chapitos-y-la-mayiza/
Valle, L. (2023) Familias desaparecidos enfrentan desinformación. NTR Zacatecas. https://ntrzacatecas.com/2023/11/familias-de-desaparecidos-enfrentan-desinformacion/
World Health Organization. Let’s flatten the infodemic curve. (2024, August 19). https://www.who.int/news-room/spotlight/let-s-flatten-the-infodemic-curve
Value proposition: What added value or unique value proposition is your Accelerator Lab bringing to solving this challenge? Why is it your Lab that needs to work on this challenge and not other actors within UNDP, other stakeholders in the country respectively? Why is it worth investing resources to this challenge?
The added value of the Accelerator Lab include (1) the design of participatory methodologies to understand the impacts and perspectives of key stakeholders; (2) codesign initial protocols that can support stakeholders in strengthening information integrity; and (3) offer tools for systemic understanding of the phenomenon that can enrich a multistakeholder dialogue on pathways and collaboration opportunities to address disinformation.
Short “tweet” summary: We would like to tweet what you are working on, can you summarize your challenge in a maximum of 280 characters?
The AccLab is exploring along with different stakeholders how disinformation may impact public life in Zacatecas and codesign institutional, community and media guidelines to strengthen information integrity powered by collective intelligence.
Learning questions
Learning question: What is your learning question for this challenge? What do you need to know or understand to work on your challenge statement?
(1) What are the main sources, channels and impacts of disinformation that influence the perception of security according to the three key stakeholders identified: women and youth community leaders, Social Communication areas of Government departments, and traditional and emergent media?
To what stage(s) in the learning cycle does your learning question relate?
Sense, Explore
Usage of methods: Relating to your choice above, how will you use your methods & tools for this learning question? What value do these add in answering your learning question?
The chosen methods will allow us to: (1) engage participants in the subject and understand how disinformation is produced and impacts the lives and perception of safety of different actors;
Existing data gaps: Relating to your choice above, what existing gaps in data or information do these new sources of data addressing? What value do these add in answering your learning question?
As the subject is rather new among the actors, the information gathered will allow us to map the issue within the context of Zacatecas and: (1) better understand how disinformation exists and impacts different stakeholders;
Comments
Log in to add a comment or reply.