Disclaimer:
Please be aware that the content herein has not been peer reviewed. It consists of personal reflections, insights, and learnings of the contributor(s). It may not be exhaustive, nor does it aim to be authoritative knowledge.
Learnings on your challenge
What are the top key insights you generated about your learning challenge during this Action Learning Plan? (Please list a maximum of 5 key insights)
In our study we tried to answer the question: “How to empower girls and young women to choose STEM education and retain themselves in STEM”? The main insights that were obtained based on the findings of the STEM report were divided on three levels.
micro level, it is recommended to:
1. develop interest in STEM professions through the presentation of role models (girls and women from Uzbekistan studying STEM,engaged in STEM professions) in social media, popular science TV channels, TEDTalks programs and speeches.
2. develop girls and young women’s self-efficacy, perseverance in achieving goals, self-control, and reflection as personal qualities through their engagement in school-based personal growth training programs, as well as in computer skills training programs, programming skills programs, and competitions to create mobile applications for the population.
3. Build interest and motivation for STEM professions and related identity among girls in younger school and teenage years by engaging them in various STEM-related programs.
meso-level, it is recommended to:
1. for schools to introduce parents to the prospect of engaging children in STEM professions through joint field classes, meetings with parents engaged in STEM professions.
2. create a system of cooperation between technical universities and industrial enterprises, aimed at further employment of female graduates and mentoring of female students by employees of professional organizations.
3. improve professional orientation programs in general education institutions, which will contribute to the empowerment of girls in their choice of profession.
macro level, it is recommended to:
1. to implement further policies to support women’s education in higher, secondary specialized and professional educational institutions in Uzbekistan at the legal and regulatory level.
2. allocate special grants and scholarships, internships on specialty in leading foreign HEIs and enterprises for female students and young women scientists.
Considering the outcomes of this learning challenge, which of the following best describe the handover process? (Please select all that apply)
Our work has not yet scaled
Can you provide more detail on your handover process?
Report and findings were presented at the end of November and we have received a high interest from our public partners and UNDP colleagues . The work has not been yet scaled but the plan is scale up recommendations that were obtained in the report.
Please paste any link(s) to blog(s) or publication(s) that articulate the learnings on your frontier challenge.
Data and Methods
Relating to your types of data, why did you chose these? What gaps in available data were these addressing?
Focus-group interviews and in-depth interviews as a qualitative method provided to our study a large data that included different perceptions, insights, attitudes and other information of STEM education and profession among girls and women.
Paper Surveys (sociological and psychological questionnaires) – as quantitative method helped us to collect information from large pool of respondents (450) and validate information/results that were gathered from the focus-group and in-depth interviews.
Why was it necessary to apply the above innovation method on your frontier challenge? How did these help you to unpack the system?
Ethnography – through the interviews among different groups of respondents to understand the environment of the respondents that are involved/engage directly or indirectly with STEM activities.
Proof of Concept – provided evidence that the idea of STEM study is spot by gathering insights from the team and experts in this area.
Visual thinking – used among girls in STEM that allowed us to see their ideas and plans about the future in STEM with the help of visual art and imagery.
Partners
Please indicate what partners you have actually worked with for this learning challenge.
Please state the name of the partner:
INHA University in Tashkent
What sector does your partner belong to?
Academia
Please provide a brief description of the partnership.
IT focused University where we conducted one of our focus group interviews and further their students were part of our TeldTalks during presentation of the findings and shared their personal stories of getting into the STEM education. This university supported AccLab UNDP Uzbekistan in presenting results to the wider public.
Is this a new and unusual partner for UNDP?
Yes
End
Bonus question: How did the interplay of innovation methods, new forms of data and unusual partners enable you to learn & generate insights, that otherwise you would have not been able to achieve?
combination of applied methods and data, support from the Academia and other private sectors where we conducted survey and in-depth interviews helped us to prepare first results in STEM study in Uzbekistan. There is high interest not only from our national partners but also from other UN agencies and IDOs that participated at the event.
Please upload any further supporting evidence / documents / data you have produced on your frontier challenge that showcase your learnings.
The closing form saves automatically or via the blue "save changes" button the top left. Thank you
Comments
Log in to add a comment or reply.